Understanding Shakespeare > Literary criticism > Twentieth century and beyond > New Criticism
As valuable as it is, historical criticism has not been without its opponents. A major critical movement of the 1930s and '40s was the so-called New Criticism of F.R. Leavis, L.C. Knights, Derek Traversi, Robert Heilman, and many others, urging a more formalist approach to the poetry. Close reading became the mantra of this movement. At its most extreme, it urged the ignoring of historical background in favour of an intense and personal engagement with Shakespeare's language: tone, speaker, image patterns, and verbal repetitions and rhythms. Studies of imagery, rhetorical patterns, wordplay, and still more gave support to the movement. At the commencement of the 21st century, close reading remained an acceptable approach to the Shakespearean text.
-
·Introduction
-
·Shakespeare the man
-
·Shakespeare the poet and dramatist
-
·Shakespeare's plays and poems
-
·The early plays
-
·The poems
-
·Plays of the middle and late years
-
-
·Shakespeare's sources
-
·Understanding Shakespeare
-
·Questions of authorship
-
·Linguistic, historical, textual, and editorial problems
-
·Literary criticism
-
·Seventeenth century
-
·Eighteenth century
-
·Romantic critics
-
·Twentieth century and beyond
-
-
-
·Additional Reading
-
·Modern editions
-
·Shakespeare biography
-
·Shakespearean staging and acting companies
-
·Censorship and governmental regulation
-
·Critical studies
-
·History of Shakespeare criticism
-
·Criticism of Shakespearean characters
-
·Historical criticism
-
·New Criticism
-
·Shakespeare's language and imagery
-
·Psychological, archetypal, and mythological criticism
-
·New Historicism, cultural materialism, Marxist criticism, and political theatre
-
·Feminist criticism and gender studies
-
·Post-structuralism and deconstruction
-
·Broad-spectrum criticism: language, themes, thought
-
·Shakespearean comedy
-
·Shakespearean tragedy
-
·Shakespearean history
-
·Dramaturgy and Shakespeare in the theatre
-
-

